ABSTRACT
There were massive interruptions, including patient visits for dietary advice and dental services, during the COVID-19 outbreak. This study assessed the feasibility of an online diabetes wellness programme among periodontitis patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Patients were grouped into the intervention group (IG) and control group (CG). At baseline and week 12, all patients answered online questionnaires on diabetes-related knowledge, physical activity, and oral impacts on daily performances (OIDP). Body weight and waist circumference were self-measured with guided instructions. Diet recalls were used to estimate dietary and added sugar intake. All patients received a weekly educational video, but the IG attended three e-consultation sessions with a dietitian (weeks 1, 3, and 8) and a dentist (week 8) via video call. A semi-structured interview was conducted to collate qualitative feedback among the IG participants at the end of the programme. A total of 24 periodontitis patients (14 IG and 10 CG) participated in this study. Among the IG patients, significant improvements in diabetes knowledge, body weight, BMI, calories, carbohydrates, fat, and added sugar intakes were observed at week 12. The CG patients only had a significant reduction in carbohydrate intake post intervention. No changes were reported in physical activity level and OIDP for both groups. Feedback received from the IG participants included convenience, practical, preferred approach during the pandemic, increased awareness and knowledge, and favourable lifestyle changes. This study demonstrates that an online diabetes wellness programme with healthcare professionals is feasible and can facilitate knowledge and lifestyle improvements that can be adapted during the crisis situation.
ABSTRACT
Background: Aerosol-producing dental procedures are of concern in the spread of infections, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Periodontal prophylaxis is the most common aerosol-producing procedure conducted in dental practice globally. During COVID-19, many national and international organizations advocated the use of pre-procedural mouth rinsing to prevent the spread of infections from aerosol-generating procedures in the dental setting; however, many questioned the scientific basis for such recommendations. Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-procedural rinsing when preforming periodontal prophylaxis in reducing aerosol contamination in the dental setting. Methods: A comprehensive standardized search strategy was employed, informed by a defined PICO question across four electronic databases. The review of the literature was conducted using the PRISMA framework. Agreement between assessors was determined throughout. Synthesis of study characteristics and key outcomes were conducted. Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was employed to assess the quality/bias among studies. Results: The initial search yielded 731 citations across the four databases; 95 potentially effective studies were identified, with 56 effective studies found. Thirty randomized control trial studies were identified, 21 with a focus on effectiveness of pre-procedural mouth rinsing, involving 984 participants (aged 18-70). Agreement between assessors was high (Kappa >0.80). Various pre-procedural mouth rinses were tested, most frequently chlorhexidine (CHX) in 18 studies. The concentrations, volume, and prescribed duration of rinsing varied among studies, hampering meta-analyses. Nonetheless, all studies identified significant reductions in bacterial contamination, as measured by colony forming units (cfu). The effectiveness of CHX over other agents was evident with more than half of the studies (7/15) reporting over a 70% reduction in bacterial contamination (cfu). There were concerns over the risk of bias in most studies (76.2%); 19.0% had a high risk of bias and 4.8% were of low risk of bias. Conclusion: There is substantial evidence to support pre-procedural mouth rinsing, such as with chlorohexidine, to effectively reduce aerosol contamination when performing periodontal prophylaxis compared to mouth rinsing with water or not rinsing.